1 Also noteworthy are the Septuagint fragments from Nahal Hever and Qumran We also have manuscripts that were copied by Jewish scribes around the same time the New Testament was being written, such as Oxyrhynchus 35. Papyrus Fouad 266 is likewise from a century or two before. Our oldest copy, Papyrus Rylands 458, is from some 200 years before the New Testament was written.

Indeed, though few and fragmentary, we have Septuagint manuscripts from well before the birth of Jesus. That the Septuagint already existed and was widely known and used prior to the time of the New Testament is a verifiable fact of history. Secondly, even if it didn’t, the Old Testament quotations found in the New Testament would still present the King James Onlyist with the same problem, if not a worse problem. First of all, the Septuagint clearly did exist before the New Testament. Thus, they believe, they can reject the Septuagint as a perversion while still embracing the New Testament. Since the New Testament obviously contains Old Testament citations that match the Septuagint word for word, these KJVO proponents claim that the Septuagint was a later invention that copied from the New Testament rather than the other way around. This issue has led many of the more extreme King James Onlyists to try and evade the problem by denying that New Testament authors actually did quote from the Septuagint. Yet, when compared to the Old Testament of the King James Version (or even to the Hebrew manuscripts on which the KJV is based), the Septuagint contains some notable differences, both textually and in the approach to translation. For example, the men who wrote the New Testament (and the Holy Spirit who inspired them) had no problem quoting from the Septuagint (the ancient translation of the Hebrew Old Testament into Greek) and treating it as the word of God without qualification. Thus, one of the great biblical difficulties for King James Onlyism is the New Testament authors’ own use of translations. The core assumption is that, if there are any differences from the KJV, whether they be textual differences or differences in the approach to translation, then the version in question cannot be the word of God. Thus, all of these translations and others like them are rejected. They obviously word things differently (if they didn’t, they would just be copies of the KJV and not new translations) and they are, in various places, more or less literal than the KJV. King James Onlyists also distrust translations like the NKJV or MEV because, even though these translations utilize the exact same Greek and Hebrew texts as the KJV, they don’t always translate those texts precisely the same way. They are based on manuscripts that read slightly different than those used by the King James Translators. King James Onlyists distrust translations like the NASB or ESV because, when compared to the KJV, they contain some textual differences. Hebrew Bible is older and an inspiration for other religions as well, and Septuagint is the translation of the same for Jewish in Egypt.Did the Septuagint Exist Before the New Testament? It just differs in the language used for writing the book and the time period of fixing these books. Hebrew Bible and Septuagint both are the same, as both are combating of same books. All of them have positive thoughts that help us to clear our minds from confusion. It does not depend on whether it belongs to any specific community or denominations. Religious texts are like a torchbearer that shows the path in the darkness of life. On the other hand, Septuagint is written in Koine Greek. The language used to write Hebrew Bible is Biblical Hebrew and Biblical Aramaic.On the other hand, Septuagint was basically made for Jewish in Egypt. Hebrew Bible is basically for Christians and also related to Judaism and Islam.The other names of the Hebrew Bible are old testament, Tanakh, etc., whereas Septuagint is known as LXX, meaning seventy.On the other hand, Septuagint belongs to the period of 3rd century BC. The Hebrew Bible first appeared in the 8th century BC.The main difference between Hebrew Bible and Septuagint is that Hebrew Bible is a religious text in biblical Hebrew, but Septuagint is the same text translated into Greek.Brenton 1851 Translation Check Price on Amazon Main Differences Between Hebrew Bible and Septuagint We found the best deal(s) on Amazon for you # Preview Product 1 The Septuagint with Apocrypha in English: The Sir Lancelot C.

Is kjv and septuagint the same